NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 156(3) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, SECTION 52, 54 OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872, RULE 4 , 4(3) OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY (APPLICATION TO ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY) RULES, 2016, SECTION 7, 7(1), 7(2), 7(5), 7(5)(A), 8, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21(6A)(A), 21(6A)(B), 31(1), 33 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 AND SECTION 138, 141 OF THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881
Deepraj Investments Pvt. Ltd Vs. Sai Precious Traexim Private Limited, (2020) 06 NCLT CK 0033 NCLT allowed the application filed by the applicant on behalf of Applicant claiming to be Financial Creditor under Section 7 of the IBC, 2016. While allowing the application NCLT held that mere plain reading of the provision and the decision referred above show that under Section 7 of IBC, 2016, the Adjudicating Authority to see whether there is a financial debt and default has occurred in repayment of that debt or not, the application is complete or whether any disciplinary proceedings is pending against the proposed RP or not. So far dispute is concerned like Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, in section 7 of IBC, 2016, proceedings, there is no scope to raise the disputes. Therefore, the averments made in the reply regarding the dispute raised by the Corporate Debtor is concerned, in our considered view, is not liable to accepted. When we shall consider the case in hand, in the light of aforesai...